Poetry Analysis Essay Example for Free

Poetry Analysis EssayPoems atomic number 18 create verbally by m either different people, in many different forms. People train scripted songs around almost e trulything you could imagine. There is poetry written well-nigh everyday experiences, and the most exaggerated imaginations. oddment is a form of poetry that I find very intriguing. Mostly beca use up of the little we know active what happens after decease. There is no answer to this question only speculation on what each soulfulness believes happens beyond life. This is where poets use their imaginations to entertain us with what they see as life after death. This subject offer fool no limit because there is no centering to prove or disprove any of their thoughts. Everyone look ats about death at one point it is an inevitable part of life. One we all have to deal with at one or more(prenominal) propagation in our lives, poetry can fall in us different perspectives of such subjects that be not al representat ions easy to deal with. I have chosen Emily Dickensons because I could not stop for death, and John Updikes Dogs shoemakers last to analyze. Both of these meters are about death simply they are also very different and are told from a different point of view.Emily Dickenson is well known for her verse forms about death. During the course of her career she has entertained her instructers with a very unique view about death. Though each rime about death she writes has a different perspective, a different points of view or meaning, making them very interesting to drive. Emily Dickensons poesy Because I could not stop for death is not in the traditional rhyme scheme that is normally associated with poems. This poem is written in iambic meter in quadrants, meaning that each stanza is made up of 10 syllables.This particular type of rhyme is supposed to be subtle. The first time I read this poem I had a hard time understanding what I was reading. The poem is written in a unique way that I did not recognize. I had to read the poem several times and write myself some notes before I could piece it all together. From what I gathered the narrator of this poem is speaking to us from beyond the grave. The Narrator is to busy to stop for death, so death would stop for her. I felt like in this poem gave death a different persona than we usually see. conclusion in this poem is kind of courteous when he was alone with her on the carriage leading her to her lowest resting place. Death also takes time for her by putting away her labor and leisure. Though the description of death were daunting and descriptive of what I would expect death to look like. This poem is a person-to-person journey that she is taking when she realizes that she is dead and watching her own life pass her by on her way to her final resting place. She is pretty calm about the events that are taking place, hinting that either she has been dead for a bandage or she was aware that death was near.Emil y Dickenson is narrating this business relationship as the dead through the course of her life. Dogs Death by John Updike is another poem about death written in a very different point of view. This poem was written in a narrative point of view, which I speculate was a good fit for the poem. Typically narrative would be told as a business relationship but it subject fields well for this poem. Though both poems are told by the narrator in dogs death there is a ground of emotion that is not seen in Emily Dickensons poem. Speaker reveals a trade about the nature of the situation by simple terms.He mentions his children, and his wife. These terms make it easy for us to piece together the situation. These clues tell us that the writer is an older male he is a married man and a father. John Updike uses terms like surrounded by love which gives the reader a way to relate. Johns poem was very cleverly written. John Updike wrote this poem with a limited sum total of rhyme scheme but i t is still very easy to watch. This poem caught my attention first because I am a dog lover and I can relate to the story teller. I think that this would be true for many of its readers.The images of the narrator holding the puppy, and petting its fur, on the way to the vet show that the narrator is loving and compassionate. These actions are very powerful images that almost anyone can relate to. The words of this poem were easily translated into emotion then easily stored into the memory of the reader. The narrator tells a story about a family with a new puppy, and the familys feelings surrounding the tragic event that just happened to their dog. In the beginning of the poem the narrator begins by letting the reader know some of the specifics about the story.He tells us about the use of newspaper for training the dog, symbolizing that the dog is still a puppy. He tells of the family including a wife and children which gives depth to the loss of family member. There is also a littl e insight of what had happened to the dog in the very beginning when He says she must have been kicked unseen or brushed by a car. Then in the second stanza he states that the autopsy later revealed that she had a ruptured liver. This poem does not follow a traditional rhyme scheme just like Emily Dickensons poem.Poems are sometimes luxurious by their rhyme scheme, and Emily Dickensons poem is a good example of how poetry can work even without a rhyme scheme. Johns poem follows a rhyme scheme but only in certain parts of the poem. Both of these poems are told with a beginning, middle, and end. Though, the perspective of these stories, are all told different. These are two poems about death that could not be any further apart. Emily Dickensons poem is told from the afterlife watching her life pass her by as she passes into eternity. This story is not particularly distressing and I dont think it was meant to be.This story is told about a person who lived their life and was judge that it is time to move on. Though this story is about death it is not meant to be sad or invoke those types of feelings. In John Updikes Dogs Death this poem is meant to be sad. This poem shows a connection with a family member. This family spent time training this puppy, and had developed a connection with the puppy. Both narrators in both poems use very powerful images to tell the story. The reader develops the story even more by telling of the children. This story is also more recent of a poem.In Emily Dickensons poem they talk about a carriage, and in John Updikes poem they drive in a car to the vet. They are both written in stanzas using Quadrants. In the end I would have to say that Emily Dickensons poem is more sophisticated. I think that her poem shows more creativity and has a very unique point of view. I think that this poem does a very good job at making the reader think about what the narrator is trying to say. On the other side I think that John Updikes poem is one tha t can relate to the masses. John Updike chose to write about something that all of us can read and relate to.I like this type of poem because it evokes emotion from you as you read. Both of these poems are about death but they are written in two completely different ways, telling two completely different stories, and that is what is great about poetry. References http//www. gradesaver. com/emily-dickinsons-collected-poems/study-guide/section1/ http//www. shmoop. com/because-i-could-not-stop-for-death/analysis. htmlhttp//www. goodreads. com/topic/show/73624-nov-8-dog-s-death-john-updike http//www. online-literature. com/dickinson/