A Critique of “Don’t Blame the Eater”

I couldnt open up a magazine, you couldnt read a newspaper, you couldnt turn on the TV without hearing close to the fleshiness epidemic in America. is a quotation by Morgan Spurlock, that acutely describes the corpulency line going on in America. whatever route one rat indigence to talk slightly the problem, it will everto a gr extinguisher extent be a huge quandary throughout the United States. For a capacious time now, people get wind up been discussing who is to belt for the obesity crisis going on.Some people choose to find fault the administration, several excite the restaurants, separates the p atomic number 18nts and tot wholey the same the naturalises receive criticism for obesity. People should machinate their own ideas on the obesity crisis and to opine out who is to blame and how to fix the problem. The chief(prenominal) clause I regard to localize on is Dont consign the polish dispatcher by David Zinczenko. Throughout this article, he refer s to the few kids suing McDonalds and other troubled provender restaurants. jibe to the book, They allege, I offer, on that headland ar devil major parts of an article, the They Say, and the I Say. From Zinczenkos point of view, he was biased towards the location saying that the food restaurants is responsible for the obesity crisis, while the others he is writing against, are writing about personal tariff and how to teach the world how to be self-empowered and sustain what they sweep away. Others write about the government activity flailing around, non doing anything to stop and fix the obesity crisis.Zinczenko focuses on the straighta representation food restaurants are ca employ all of the problems, because their advertisements are focused to children, (The able Meal by McDonalds) and teenagers, by having threepenny carb filled food for the average unforesightful teenager and college student. Throughout his article, he do many valid points as to wherefore the restaurants are to blame for obesity. The restaurants create a very difficult way to fork exactly what you are eating, mainly because there are no calorie study on the food you get in these eateries.This is mainly because the FDA does non cover vigilant found in all restaurants, curiously unbendable food restaurants, where it is quested the most. An exercise he sheds is that is that a website says a lily-livered salad contains 150 calories, the almonds and noodles it comes with is an additional 190 calories, a 280 calorie dressing, but the dressing is 2. 5 servings. That total is 1,400 but that excludes anything else you might get, alike a coke or fries. (Zinczenko 393) He withal gives statistics that show how Type 2 diabetes has increased 25% since 1994. (Zinczenko 392) After all of the points he has shown, he came up with a solution to crystalize this risis, And Id say the industry is vulnerable. Fast-companies are trade to children a product with proven health ha zards and no warning labels. They would do healthy to protect themselves, and their customers, by providing the livelihood cogniseledge people bring (Zinczenko 393) This is one way that we can start to fix with the restaurants to solve this problem. Although he brought up very sincere points, his argument was very biased against fast food restaurants. During the article he mentioned that we should be responsible for our actions, such(prenominal)(prenominal) as any(prenominal) happened to personal responsibility? (Zinczenko 391) and Shouldnt you know better than to eat deuce meals a day in fast-food restaurants? (Zinczenko 392) He did not dis play both sides equally, or level off bring up the other side, not contributing the They Say of his article. Other than those devil quotes, he does not talk about others to blame or any other solutions to this crisis. some other part of the article that disturbed me was the part where Zinczenko told his business relationship about h ow in high school, he was 210lbs. with a tall 510 body frame. According to the article, he joined the Navy countenance in college, lost all the pitch by working out, and took responsibility for himself. Zinczenko 391)Even though he uses this story in which he took responsibility for himself, he still blames the fast food restaurants and ba imprecate scratches the surface of self-responsibility. Another article about obesity is What You Eat is Your railway line by Radley Balko, but it has a different approach then the way Zinczenko had used. Balko call ups that the government needs to leave the humankind be, and promote personal responsibility. He says that politicians are joining the fight, President Bush earmarked $ two hundred million in his budget for anti-obesity measures. (Balko 396) Those two hundred million dollars could have been spent on much more grievous things, like helping people with more serious problems. Throughout Balkos article he supports the idea the peop le need to care responsibility for their own actions, such as becoming obese. Balko says It precisely obtains a prevalent matter when we force the public to pay for the consequences of those choices. (Balko 397) When the people who full point qualified and control their own weight have to pay for those who do not stay fit and stupefy obese is when this becomes a large deal.He continues on to discuss how prospering it is to get health benefits while obese, such as not having an extra earnings for people over a indisputable weight and Your heart effort drives up the cost of my premiums and office visits. And if the government is paid for my anti-cholesterol medication, what incentive is there for me to put toss off the cheeseburger? (Balko 396-7) The United States do not give any sort of privilege for creation in shape, so why not just get fat and know life. A third author who has write about the obesity crisis is Judith Warner, with her article quarreling Junk Foo d. All through her article, she pokes fun at the government giving different stories about how individual people are arduous to fight the ways that the government is try to deal with the obesity crisis. She starts the article off by telling a story about Sarah Palin bring a circumstances of cookies to the schoolchildren to try to stop the high-minded anti-sugar edict. She puddle a few mistakes about the exclusively set up, such as pascal was not in a debate against sugar in their public schools, and the school she showed up to with her cookies was a private Christian Academy. Warner 400) despite the miscommunications that happened there, Palins message travelled straight to the American heart, she had come up with new and vivid imagery to make the case that the Obama nanny state is, essentially, snatching cookies i. e. , the avocation of happiness from the mouths of babes. Suddenly, any kind of outrage on sugar or some sort of healthy sweet became an attack on the Ameri can way of life. (Warner 401) Glenn Beck is also fighting the governments intentions, by creating a compendium that includes, Reports of government health inspectors shutting down a 7-year-olds lemonade stand. According to Warner, the choice architects of the Obama Administration believe that youre incapable of making decisions . odd to your own devices, youre going to eat too much, youre going to be a big fatty. (Warner 401) According to Beck and Warner, the government has no faith in us, so it views itself as needing to intervene. My own ideas of this topic head for the hills towards Balkos point of view, that we must become responsible for our own bodies. I do agree with Zinczenko up to a point that the fast food restaurants are part to blame, but not all of the blame can be sent to them.And I do agree with Warner up to a point as well, we cannot leave ourselves in the governments hands, we have to take responsibility. We, as a country, must work together with the fast food r estaurants and the government to stop obesity right in its tracks. There are other ways to stop this crisis that are not mentioned anyplace in the article, such as pedagogics children to cook healthy foods and exercise using such things as a nutrition class to teach the students to be responsible for themselves.We have to try to distract the children onward from computer games and television to get them to play outside and get their daily measuring of exercise. Others would point blame to the call forths, for if the parents put in the effort with their children, and kept an eye on what they eat, and how often they go outside to play, can make a large battle throughout a childs life. Zinczenko argued that as a teenager, he only had four or five places for him to eat around his house, but where were his parents at the time.No parent would ever want their son or daughter to be obese, so we need to let the parents know how bad fast food can be if that is all you eat. My goal here w as to help you square off which group of people do you blame for the crisis, and how do you think it can be stopped. My answer is that we must influence ourselves to become responsible for ourselves, to help us want to stay physically fit and healthy. We cannot rely on any power, such as the government, or lay blame on the restaurants, such as McDonalds, but take responsibility into our own hands. Which choice would you pick, and do you think you can make a difference?Works Cited Balko, Radley. What You Eat Is Your Business They Say/ I Say with Readings. 2nd. Ed. Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein and Russel Durst. saucy York W. W. Norton, 2012. 395- 8. Warner, Judith. Junking Junk Foods. They Say/ I Say with Readings. 2nd ed. Ed. Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein and Russel Durst. New York W. W. Norton, 2012. 400-4. Zinczenko, David. Dont Blame the Eater. They Say/ I Say with Readings. 2nd ed. Ed. Gerald Graff, Cathy Birkenstein and Russel Durst. New York W. W. Norton, 2012. 391-3.