Causes of the English Civil War Essay

Charles I came to the throne in 1625 after the end of his father, mob I. His restrain maintained rough similarities with his fathers manage. For instance, both(prenominal) Charles and James had truly little silver and both of them believed firmly in the godly get-go of indexship1. During his reign, many events took place which led to the slope Civil War in 1642 and which finish up with the public execution of Charles I. This adjudicate will discuss and deal with the varied factors that gave rise to the slope Civil War. As was said above, one of the main problems of Charles reign was the lack of money and, undoubtedly, this was a practiced reason for a courteous war. Everything started when the parliament asked Charles to go to war with the Catholics in Spain.Charles did non contrive the needed money to smell this war and so he asked for taxes, the taxes were non enough and the war was im realizable. This outraged the system of macrophages besides they knew that Charles would then call(a) them bandaging for help. fan tan did non like Charles because they conceit he spent money besides on his favourites so the King himself would flip to vex a way to stimulate money. Charles tested several things such as enforcing taxes known as ship money2, selling monopolies and titles he also created a Court of Star Chamber which was compose by1 The divine store of kingship According to this doctrine, since only God flush toilet judge an unjust king, the king stern do no wrong. (Definition provided by http//www.princeton.edu/achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Divine_Right_of_Kings.html) 2 Nonparliamentary tax first levied in knightly times by the English ceiling on coastal cities and counties for naval exoneration in time of war. (Definition provided by http//www.britannica.com/EBchecked/ outcome/540944/ship-money) officials of the crown and which main purpose was to ok people heavily so as to raise money.As there was non a jury, this court w ould obviously satisfy his expectations. sevens was in reality angry for the wicked situation, so Charles heady to dissolve it. The reign continued for eleven years without a fantan. He called a Parliament once more just because he needed money. The Covenanters verbalised their desire to invade England and Charles did not do the sufficient money to fight them.The Parliament refused to give him money from the taxes and Charles dissolved it once more. blushtually, as he was forced to pay a determined sum of money to the Scots, he called a Parliament again. He was finished economically. Undoubtedly, Charles poor economic manage and his uncool decisions were closely related to the outbreak of the gracious war. some other crucial cause was religion. These quarrels began when Charles marry to Henrietta Maria who was a French Catholic. Having a Catholic as a promote was not accepted at all by English people, especially by the Puritans.Things went worse when the King made Wil liam predicate the Archbishop of Canterbury in 1633. The Archbishop modified many things in the Church. For instance, beatifying the Church and bringing back robes for priests, statues and stained-glass windows. laud also attempted to impose the English orison Book3 in Scotland. As Scotland was a Puritan (Presbytarian) country, they rioted against this Too Catholic Prayer Book and a group of Scots, the Covenanters, decided to invade England as it was mentioned in the previous(prenominal) paragraph. After putting Laud on trial, the Parliament found him guilty.3 A book which utter how services should be run (Definition provided by http//www.bbc.co.uk/desoxyribonucleic acid/place-london/A622937) Another major cause which led to the civil war was Charles personality. It may seem not a fundamental cause comparability it with the above mentioned ones. Nonetheless, his way of thinking, his bad decisions, his conflicts with the mononuclear phagocyte system, his wifes influence and h is contradictory and unconformable reign also contributed to the outbreak of the civil war.During Charles reign, a distinction between a concisely Parliament and a presbyopic Parliament can be made. The Short Parliament was called in 1640 by the King because the Scots rebelled and due to his bad financial situation, he needed to levy a tax to deal with them (only with the Parliaments consent could he do it). This parliament was summoned after eleven years of dissolution. Even though such dissolution was not constitutional, it was one of the Kings prerogatives. The mononuclear phagocyte system met the gentry and expressed their feeling of indignation to them.Harbottle Grimston and John Pym led a inscription of complaints. On May 5th in the same year, Charles dissolved the Parliament again blaming the malicious cunning of some a few(prenominal) seditious affected men. Finally, Charles came to an reason with the Scots of paying them 850 a day. On the other hand, the Long Parlia ment was summoned from November third 1640 for thirteen years. Charles needed funds for the periodical payment and for a final gag law with the Scots. In this Parliament, 493MPs were elected most of them were from the County Faction4. Parliament sent both Strafford and Laud to the hulk accusing them of bad influence on the King.Charles tried to calm things down sign Straffords death warrant, passing a bear down that allowed for Parliament not to be dissolved without its own consent, a bill making ship money embezzled and other bills that taken together destruct the framework of prerogative government. 4 MPs who tried to represent the views of the landowners. (Definition provided by http//www.bbc.co.uk/dna/place-london/A622937) The Irish rebelled in 1641 because of their Kings death. Definitely, the execution of Strafford had not been a vertical choice. John Pym issued the Militia Bill and the expansive Remonstrance5 .Subsequently, Charles decided to arrest him and his ringl eaders, he tried to arrest five MPs but as they had been previously warned, Charles could not find them. As this was considered a breach of parliamentary privileges by MPs, it just made things worse between them. And it was on 22nd heroic when the civil war started. To conclude, it cannot be stated that the most chief(prenominal) cause of the English Civil War was unfair revenue because, as was described, there were many factors which created a tense relationship between Parliament and the King. Unfair taxation was a really important cause. However, it was not the only possible factor. Religious, financial and management issues played an important role as well.People who surrounded the King also took an essential spot in this big conflict. It also has to be recognized that when Charles came to the throne, things were not in intimately conditions. Neither his father nor Charles could manage their reigns properly. A civil war could not have been avoided unless Charles would have changed his mind and way of thinking but as he was born(p) with a belief in the Divine Origin of Kingship and did not have lots knowledge about kingships, it would have been very difficult to achieve. 5 It listed all the things Charles had make wrong in his reign, suggested less big businessman for bishops, and said that Parliament should have force-out over the Church and the appointment of gallant ministers. (Definition provided by http//www.bbc.co.uk/dna/place-london/A622937)